12. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

Good news for blogger who are hoping to get some exposure from Digg.com. BusinessWeek reports that Digg is opening up their service to other subject matters besides just tech. It’s not hard to understand why. The tech crowd is fine, but the bigger money in advertising will have to come from much broader audiences like politics and finance.

It’s an interesting move by Digg. On the one hand you have the attempt to appeal to a broader market, but you have to balance the needs of your current readership. If the current crowd is into technology, they may have very little interest in politics.

There’s no word on whether this makeover will involve a new design, or even breaking the website into different categories. It will be interesting to see the application. Digg is already a ridiculous popularity contest, I can just imagine who much of a cess-pool it could be when it opens up to even more fields.

10. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM

These are three things I’m thinking about more, as are many people. Video is such an incredibly potent media. Cinema, and even TV media and advertising, all have huge impacts on how people live. Can you see an internet where video plays a huge roll? It’s not hard to, as the roll of video grows each day. The advent of video sharing is getting everyone in on the act, but is there a place for the small content providers in the world of video?

I think there might be, but it’s going to take a massive effort to professionalize what you do in the field. Some of the most talented people in the world work in the genre of “video production” and all of us are used to an incredibly proficient use of the art. To make weak videos will do as much for you as writing bad copy in a text ad. The media can be the message at times, so if you don’t capture attention quickly, no one will care. It’s not hard to imagine that people have very short attention spans. Can you influence people with 10 second videos? I’m pretty sure you can, and there’s undoubtedly a niche for excellent producers.

Mobile video content is on the rise. In particular, porn videos have made the transition to cell phones and various handlhelds. And more and more mainstream media companies are making the leap. Many of the videos released on Youtube each day are produced by professionals hoping to capture the “buzz” factor.

I have no experience with video editing, but I’m working on it. I figure if I can at least learn to make some decent videos within 6 months it will become yet another way to drive traffic to my websites. I’m not planning on being a professional videographer, but I do think that there’s a great opportunity to drive traffic if you use careful self-promotional videos that also entertain.

Are you interested in video for search engine marketing? Have you used it successfully?

09. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Google

King Google has been totally mad for awhile now, but lately, the product releases and ideas are getting more bizarre. According to TechCrunch, Google is now aiming at launching a new eavesdropping technology.

The implications of this product are astounding. If there aren’t politicians working on stopping this type of product, there need to be. This is one of those ideas where any merit could be easily wiped out by the wrong use of the technology.

Techcrunch also links to the Google Research Blogspot which announces the project:

We showed how to sample the ambient sound emitted from a TV and automatically determine what is being watched from a small signature of the sound — all with complete privacy and minuscule effort. The system could keep up with users while they channel surf, presenting them with a real-time forum about a live political debate one minute and an ad-hoc chat room for a sporting event in the next.

The customer/target gets one benefit from this? And at what cost? You give your privacy rights up and get what back in exchange? Couldn’t private discussion be some of the “ambient sound” being emitted in the room? The funny thing is, people probably don’t care. They figure if it makes their task of entertaining themselves easier, they’ll do it. Personally, I’ll never allow any company to have open pipe access into my home.

The technology itself is interesting, and more power to the researchers for their accomplishment, but what a sketchy application. Potential abuse would be too great and many problems could arise. What if Google monitored a conversation “accidentally” where a murder was plotted? Would they contact the authorities or pretend to ignore it?

This product leaves me flat. There’s no benefit I’d sign off on to allow my PC and microphone to broadcast audio from my house to a corporation. What do you think of this project?

07. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM

If you’re in the website development game, you reach a point where you decide on working with others, or if you bring in more people for collaborations. I personally have been very reluctant to do any projects with people, and the few that I started with others dried up fast. Most of working online is just plain hard work. If you can find others to work hard, great. But what I worried about happening is spending all of my time managing people, when I could just concentrate on maximizing profit.

If you hire others, your expenses go way up and have to be offset by increased revenue. Even if you enter into a joint venture with others, you need to make more money, or it would be pointless to enter the relationship. But potentifal pitfalls exist, especially because of the unique nature of the internet.

  • The partner might steal your ideas – it’s very easy to steal intellectual property
  • The relationship might fizzle, and you end up having one more competitor for the top 3 spots of a keyword

Have you done joint projects with others? How did you set up the partnership? Do you think others in a group will pull their weight?

06. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

The most exciting aspect of “Web 2.0″ to certain people has to be the ease and speed of adaptation that’s been seen by the biggest players. When a company can become an overnight sensation without paying millions for advertising, this savings goes straight to the bottom line. Systems that draw in other users from referrals of existing users are inspirational to anyone who develops websites.

The new framework of websites is really exciting. The more fluid the user experience gets, the more likely you are to attract users en masse.

Almost every popular Web 2.0-style website has a very easy to navigate website, with clean designs and fast-loading pages. It’s a must. The less much the better, or so it seems, until you give the users a chance to add their personality to the site (I’m thinkink of MySpace Profiles here). But the basic premise seems to be:

  • Find a solution to an existing problem
  • Make your solution something easy to understand
  • Make it extremely easy to use
  • Encourage your users to tell others about your service
  • Be reliable
  • Add features
  • Make most of your features free, but charge for the really premium ones

All of these are principles that I either have or will begin implementing into my websites as quickly as I can. I missed the boat for awhile by sending most of my traffic to the context sensitive ad places, but as their payouts seem to be declining, I’m attempting to convert more one-time visitors into repeat visitors. That should make the marketing job easier overall.

What do you think of the potential of Web 2.0 as it relates to free advertising? Some of these companies are HUGE from word of mouth. Are you attempting to exploit these opportunities?

05. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Google

Ever since Google went public, it’s been getting tougher to get free traffic from Google. They make nearly constant algo changes, and the discount almost all backlinks which are counted by other search engines. In some ways, Google spends so much time analyzing links, that the idea of just creating natural pages for rankings seems almost unlikely. Their very efforts to curb spam are likely to inflame the problem even more.

What I’ve been doing in response to many of Google’s recent algo changes has been to ignore them as much as possible. I will not make a decision based on “what Google will think” of my website, because frankly, I think Google is out of touch.

Google

Like a billionaire you may have know when they were poor, Google no longer needs anyone. They have a huge market cap and a high flying stock to prop up their earnings machine, so it’s not likely they’ll be changing how they do business any time soon. If you get traffic, feel lucky, because it’s not a right, but a privilege.

Social networking websites are currently bringing in a ton of qualified traffic and that trend is likely to continue. You can find live bodies easily operating through the social network sites, who can be marketed to subtly and effectively. This traffic is very direct, and gives you a chance to convert them to your website for low or no cost.

Sure, Google is still the main referrer on most of my sites, but I’m looking forward to a day when there’s plenty of sources providing traffic to me. The whole world is still a bit Google-centric, but I see that dwindling every day.

04. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM

Search engine marketers spend too much time looking for links. Instead, they should let links come looking for their website. What’s the best way to do this? Give people something to link to, and make it easy for them to do so. What types of web pages do people freely link to:

  • Websites that give away something useful for free. An example would be a website that gives away a free counter in exchange for a linkback. The same applies for many scripts which run the “Powered by” link on each page. If you have programming and design skills, you can custom craft a script to give away to get links.
  • Websites with high quality and deep content. People link to Wikipedia and its’ articles all the time because of indepth info contributed by volunteers.
  • Websites that “do something” tend to get a lot of incoming links. If people can use your website, they’re likely to link to you. Think of how well Google has done by offering a simple website where people do something (search)
Link Love

What other tactics can you think of for “attracting” links as opposed to looking for them? There’s a big difference in the mindsets between attracting them and longing for them. Indeed, if you desire links too much, you might even drive them away. Lot’s of times it’s better to concentrate on improve the unique selling proposition of your website, and let incoming links come to you at their own pace. It all depends on your SEM goals.

Do you get a lot of natural links? Why?

02. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM

If you’re into search engine marketing, you’re already very familiar with the concept of niches. Niches relate pretty closely to keywords, for the most part, but with some more thought, you can define them even better. If you’re really new to internet marketing, your best bet is going to be to build a website that targets a tight niche. There are several reasons:

1) There’ll be less competition than in a major keyword category, so you can learn the art of internet marketing and actually stand a chance to make some money
2) You can keep focused as you build your website easier, so site construction is a simple task. Since you’re learning, you want to be able to conceptualize your design quite well, so you can develop techniques for acquiring traffic that you know work

Target Niches

What’s an example of a niche?

Web design => idaho web design => idaho flash web design

The four keyword phrase is pretty specific. If you are a web designer, living in Idaho, and specializing in Flash designs, this would be the killer keyword category for you to land. As you become more specific in your marketing and targeting, you’re more likely to experience an increase in conversions. Your traffic might be low, but the people who come to the site are really and truly looking for your product! It’s up to you to close them, but you have a much better chance when you target a specific niche.

Do you target specific niches, or do you attempt to be broad in your appeal?

01. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM

Yahoo is the first of the major search engines to figure out that Shoemoney has been replaced. MSN and Google are acting stupid, so I might need to force feed them the right answer. You know how Google is: always moving around, ever shifting. The Google winner might just come down to the last day.

Yahoo Shoemoney

The competition has been heating up. It looks like I’m making ShoeMoney famous, which is what he hoped for. He’ll be even more famous when I replace him.

I see more people joining the ShoeMoney competition and these guys are some of the best in the business. Who knows, I might have to bring out the Tommy Guns of Optimizing…a weapon so fierce, I would hate to unleash it on an unsuspecting internet. But I will…if I have to.

The new Shoe revolution is underway. Get on board.

01. June 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

Great news for fans of Bloglines. According to Techcrunch today, Ask.com is releasing a new blog search for their Bloglines.

BlogLine Search

This should produce some additional value for Bloglines, and it also helps establish Ask.com as more of a leader in search. It’s a chance for them to showcase technology in the blogosphere.

The search utility for now appears underwhelming. They appear to be pulling data from a limited universe of sites. However, it’s not bad for a start and they conveniently list related feeds at the right. I don’t think we’re breaking any ground here, but perhaps as Ask.com delves deeper into search, they’ll be able to improve upon their seach strategy. They’re big believers in using reputation system style ranking, so their results may at least look different than the others.

The best way for you to find out if you like this blog search is to use it. Give it a try and give feedback to Ask. The more competitors in the search space, the better, as far as I’m concerned. The more big companies out there promoting blog readership, and building tools to help people find blogs, the more likely your blog is to be found. We’ll see how Ask does in the blog search space.

What do you think of the new Bloglines search?