31. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

I have to hand it to Yahoo, they’ve really outdone themselves with the Yahoo Developer Network. These folks designed a great site and they made sure to pay a great deal of attention to detail. They have source code examples in all of the popular languages, and their documentation is outstanding. Which of Yahoo’s Web Services can you interface with? Almost all of them!

Even the Yahoo acquired properties like Flickr and del.ici.us are well represented here. Yahoo has attempted to use a unified interface, where applicable, and accessing the data is relatively easy, depending on your programming knowledge.

Yahoo Developer Network

. Of particular interest is the Yahoo! User Interface Library, which can help you build a website with a unified user interface using Yahoo! code.

The amount of code available is so immense, that there’s no point attempting to cover it a short summary like this one. Instead, I encourage you to investigate the page and see some of the APIs available. I wrote a short application today using Siteexplorer which went together surprisingly easily, considering it was the first time I used the API. The documentation and example code is very straightforward. I plan on covering more uses of the API in the future, but I figured I’d introduce this incredible resource to anyone who hadn’t heard of it yet.

30. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

This post extends on a conversation I was having with Gomer. In it, we discussed what Web 2.0 means to us, and we both admit although it’s new to us, we think the concept is the future. Usability is what seperates the “men from the boys” in a sense in the online world. Picture almost any website that you’ve visited in the last few years frequently. It’s a site you “use” isn’t it? Well now we can one step further. When we use the site, it changes along with our input. This makes web usability a fluid environment. But we need to be even more specific in our terminology, since imprecise language is a potential pitfall of communication. Let’s look at a real world example and see how it meets our criteria of Web 2.0.

Web 2.0 sites respond to users. A great example of this is NetVibes. NetVibes greets you with a generic page that says “Type your name here”. You type your name and Netvibes saves it!

Netvibes

That’s a delightful feeling and incredibly intuitive. You aren’t confronted with a lengthy signup process in order to use the service. That type of immediacy is perfect in a world of immediate gratification seekers.

Web 2.0 websites get information from other sources. Netvibes doesn’t supply it’s own backend for data. It’s merely a collection of data from other sources. Netvibes exists in order to help you organize information that’s already there!

More »

29. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

One of the key advantages to the Web 2.0 websites is just how hell they’ve grown, and mostly through word-of-mouth advertising from satisfied users. The idea is simple: your users become evangelists. Since they’re happy with your service, they tell us others, who tell others, and so on and so on. This is the key principle to building a vast membership.

Web 2.0 sites are also known for fast adoption by the masses. This is the “velocity” factor that a growing website needs to get off the ground. But one thing I can’t see working to make a “Web 2.0″ website popular is advertising. In a sense, that’s missing the point. And if a company does advertise their website, they need to be subtle, and let the people find out for themselves just how great it is.

Web 2.0

The branding should come from the usage. I think that’s one of the biggest advantages to the Web 2.0 startups. They don’t have to allocate a ton of their money to traditional advertising and marketing. That way, they can put even more money into usability, which creates a virtuous circle when it comes to promotions. New features are enough to make your rabid users go even more viral on you.

The best bet is building your website and “they” will come. The better the site is, the faster the users will head in. And each of your users has friends and associates who they’ll influence into trying. Usability needs to be the key mantra. If the usability suffers, the marketing issues will suffer along side. The Web 2.0 companies that cater to their users ahead of everything else (even monetization) will have a leg up on their competition.

28. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM

I get to look at a queue filled with “SEO articles” all day, and I have to tell you: what luck to have found such a gem of a job ;) Article writers are a new breed on the internet: many of them are keyword spammers posting as “expert authors”. Everyone loves a great writer. I envision a world where SEO article writers become the new media.

Kimmy

When I grow up, I wanna write keyword-stuffed drivel for the ‘Net!

Picture a small child, who’s waiting for her latest installment of “7 great tips about hair replacement” from her favorite author, Article Man, to appear on her BlogLines. We’ll call her Little Kimmy. Little Kimmy just loves all of Article Man’s latest stories. In fact, Kimmy is quite advanced for a child her age, and she finds AM’s articles to be top-notch. Her favorite series by him is “Breeding Labrador Puppies – in 21 parts“. She also thought his classic “Bird Flu – an epidemic flu” to be scintillating. Little Kimmy only dreams of doing one thing when she gets olders: writing SEO articles for the internet.

27. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web's Best

The controversy heated up a bit, with different camps choosing their arguments. The anti-O’Reilly people are hot, and demanding a lynching. Pro-Reilly supporters like John Battelle urge everyone to be calm, until O’Reilly returns from his vacation. Apparently, pissing people off is tiring work ;)

BoingBoing says no one can own Web 2.0, so that’s at least re-assuring for everyone who has “Web 2.0″ categories on their blogs, like me. “Web”. “2.0″. Brilliant stuff! It’s hard to believe anyone could coin a phrase like that. It’s not really too similar to “Business 2.0″, so it’s quite original. It’s hard to disagree with that sentiment. In reality, this is a case of a “small business issue” that was grossly mis-handled by someone incompetent. In essence, O’Reilly can’t gain anything from this event, but stands to lose a ton of goodwill built up for the O’Reilly network and books over the years. To think the O’Reilly empire was emperiled by a conference in Ireland makes you shake your head. But we all know just how petty corporations really are.

When O’Reilly gets back he’ll be spinning fast I’d guess. The damage may already be done.

It’s one thing to protect a copyright, but it’s another thing to be stupid about it. I doubt this controversy will do much in the long run. It’s just something for people to talk about for a few days until some far greater comes along.

26. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

I stumbled along a nice website today using my Bloglines. The site is ProgrammableWeb, which is dedicated to keeping us up to date on the latest “mashups” from the Web 2.0 universe.

ProgrammableWeb

. What a “mashup” is, is a web application derived by using the “APIs” of several web services. Simply, a new website is made, that pulls data from other websites and presents it in a unique and interesting fashion.

Mashups are popular for a ton of good reasons. Mashups are a great way to unleash the originality in people, and ProgrammableWeb offers some contests in order to appeal to people’s competive natures. The best website are featured, and that gives them additional exposure in the Web 2.0 space.

ProgrammableWeb is a definitely repository for APIs and Mashups, so I suggest you take a look at it. Some of the listed websites are just spectactular for their ingenuity, and they give you an idea of what you can do, if you’re so inclined.

24. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM

Wow! I knew taking ShoeMoney’s money would be easy, but I never had any idea just how easy.

I assumed the best of the best were going up against me, in a cataclysmic contest of ShoeMoney Supremacy. Now I’m not so sure. I mean, I debuted in the Top 30 in Yahoo within 12 hours of the contest announcement. This is without the actual page! Wait until the page is fully indexed. At what point will it debut?

Furthermore, the page is at number 41 in MSN. Could we be looking at a search engine trifecta?

The best part is: I haven’t even brought out the “big guns” yet. If I can win this one easy, I will. I’d hate to unleash the fury on an unsuspecting internet. Gentle reader, you too can help me take Shoemoney’s dough. In the meantime, we’ll see if my current SEO tactics can stand the test of time against the big boys of optimizing.

24. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Web 2.0

If Web 2.0 really is a different place, than it probably needs its’ own set of rules. At least, that’s the thinking behind a new social media press release template that is making its’ way through the Blogosphere.. Web 2.0 represents a chance for users to get involved, and for that reason alone, marketing to a “Web 2.0″ person represents a chance at aiming an effective marketing message at a tech-savvy individuals.

Take a look at the template for the social media press release. This could be pretty useful for almost anyone currently doing press releases online.

The package could be very useful for anyone. I particularly like the add to Digg and del.icio.us buttons built right in. “Re-mixable” media is becoming a bigger part of journalists jobs, so why not make it easier for them to find you and your links? A good philosophy, indeed.

23. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: SEM, Web 2.0

Please check out the newest Search Engine Marketing Podcast. This is a part of our current blitzkrieg of the internet marketing community.

This particular Podcast is intended for beginning internet marketers and attempts to clear up some of the mis-conceptions newbies may have about our industry.

Make sure to leave us any feedback you have, so we can get better. We look forward to serving you in the future for all of your search engine marketing Podcast needs.

23. May 2006 · Comments Off · Categories: Google, SEM, Web 2.0

I’ve been think about Shoemoney a lot today. I can’t kid you, gentle reader, it’s troubling. Shoemoney is a larger than life character, and I should know. I tried ignoring his constant cries for attention, but finally he got to me. He appealed to my sense of getting some easy money proving how easy it is to rank in MSN.

Why is Shoemoney willing to risk over $1,000 of his own money? Because he’s not as dumb as he looks. In fact, Shoemoney knows that having a domain name of “shoemoney.com” along with several million links ought to be enough to keep him at the top, even at the worst of search engines. And he has a point. Those with the proper age and authority should win most contests of this sort.

But what if Content really is the valiant King of the Internet Kingdom? Well then, linkage and aging shouldn’t be enough to keep him at the top forever. I guess there’s only way to find out, and that’s a knock down drag out fight for ShoeMoney Supremacy.

I urge any of my valiant readers out there, to assist me in any way possible. Place an “add to del.icio.us” vote of confidence for my noble cause. If I dont take his money, Jeremy will only spend it on more petrol. With an ever-decreasing world resource, you’d be better off giving me the money as I promise to use it only on perishable and non-durable items which are friendly to the environment.

In closing, I thank you for reading this plea. Shoemoney 4eva!